A Deleuzian Discrediting of the 2026 Animal Farm Adaptation 

Introduction: Beyond Fidelity to the Apparatus 

To begin a critique of the 2026 animated adaptation of Animal Farm by asking whether it is "faithful" to George Orwell is to accept a flawed premise. The issue is not the preservation of a sacred text, but the institutional process by which Orwell’s political fable is recomposed within a contemporary cultural machine. This adaptation, written by Nicholas Stoller and directed by Andy Serkis, is not a neutral retelling; it is a complex social and technical assemblage produced inside a specific industrial plane defined by celebrity casting, "values-driven" distribution, and a family-audience mandate.

Through the philosophical lens of Gilles Deleuze, we can see this film not as a "betrayal," but as a primary artifact of the "Society of Control". A Deleuzian discrediting steps out of the tribunal of representation to ask: what does this machine do, and what does it make impossible to think?  By replacing Orwell’s "minor literature"—which stutters the major language of power—with a "major" Hollywood grammar of "nicecore" sentimentality and individualized agency, the film functions as an apparatus of gaslighting. It manufactures a regularity of statement that produces recognition and comfort, while effectively neutralizing the revolutionary potential of the original text.

I. The Industrial Plane: Trademarked Authors and Guilded Filters

The 2026 film is the product of an industrial habitus that treats authors as marketable signatures and audiences as data streams. Screenwriter Nicholas Stoller’s career, formed in the "post-studio-comedy" terrain of the Apatow school, illustrates this. Stoller famously remarked that his mentor, Judd Apatow, "doesn't exist. He's just a trademark". This admission signals the reality of modern cultural production: authors are trademarks mediating between concentrated power and mass audiences.

Deleuze observes that machines are social before they are technical. The "social machine" here includes the Angel Studios distribution model and its "Angel Guild," a body of approximately .6 million members who act as virtual co-producers. While marketed as a "democratization" of Hollywood that bypasses gatekeepers, this system functions as a cybernetic feedback loop. It is an apparatus of capture that utilizes "continuous assessment" and "universal modulation" to ensure that only messages harmonizing with the guild’s specific demographic survive. The gaslighting occurs when this process of market validation and risk management is sold as "empowerment". The audience is not a collective subject but a collection of "dividuals"—samples and data banks that shape the product to ensure a comfortable consensus.

II. The Politics of the "Nice": Dissolving Structure into Rivalry

A defining feature of the 2026 adaptation is the movement "from class war to nicecore". This is not a moral fall from grace but a class adaptation by the professional-managerial stratum. This layer of media producers seeks to create conflict that is sharp enough for plot but containable enough for reintegration. Stoller’s core craft principle—"I don't believe in villains"—is the engine of this containment. He prefers "rivals," a narrative form that presupposes symmetry and compromise.

Class struggle, however, is rooted in durable asymmetries of property, coercion, and command—relations that do not end with a "lesson learned". By dissolving structure into psychology, the film performs a highly consequential move: it tells the audience that the enemy is excess, immaturity, or personal failure rather than the institutional reproduction of power. In Stoller's hands, even a "hedonistic monster" or a cartoon "evil capitalist" like Tex Richman from The Muppets can be redeemed through personal reconciliation rather than systemic dismantling. For an Orwell adaptation, this is a fatal dilution. Orwell’s terror is not abstract; it is bodies used up and discarded—a structural tragedy that Stoller’s "cinema of nice" is fundamentally designed to heal.

III. Lucky and the Oedipalization of Resistance

The most decisive ideological intervention in the 2026 film is the invention of "Lucky," a young piglet voiced by Gaten Matarazzo, who is "torn between competing ideologies". Turning Animal Farm into an inward-facing drama of moral choice transforms the genre from a collective cyclical tragedy into a linear coming-of-age Bildungsroman.

In Deleuzian terms, this is the "Oedipalization" of the revolution. Deleuze and Guattari argue that capitalism requires subjects who believe their problems are private dramas of the family or the individual conscience. Orwell’s animals are not protagonists choosing belief systems; they are hungry, disciplined, and separated by engineered ignorance. Lucky provides a liberal "escape vector": the fantasy that if you stay true to yourself and "wake up," you can resist. This replaces the recognition of collective material control with the pursuit of personal authenticity—a solution that systems of power prefer because it leaves the underlying relations of coercion intact.

IV. The Functional Coherence of Incoherence: Simulation and Inoculation

The 2026 adaptation presents a public framing that appears ideologically incoherent: an "anti-communism" pitch coupled with a visible "anti-corporate" aesthetic. We see a billionaire neighbor who drives a "Tesla-style Cybertruck" and spies on the animals with high-tech drones. However, Deleuze identifies this as the "functional coherence" of the simulacrum.

This synthesis performs two roles:

1. Anti-communism blocks the left exit by marking systemic alternatives as inherently tyrannical.

2. Anti-billionaire imagery provides catharsis by giving the audience a safe, grotesque object of disgust.

The figure of the "scheming neighbor" acts as an inoculation. It allows the audience to vent frustration at the image of the oligarch while leaving the structure that produces them (the capitalist axiomatic) untheorized. By naming "communism" or "cronyism" as the enemy, the film polices inference. It ensures the audience leaves thinking "authoritarianism is bad" without ever recognizing how class power reproduces itself through the management of necessity and the capture of the record.

V. "Hope" as Circuit-Closure: The Lessons of 954

The 2026 machine mirrors the historical operation of the CIA-backed 954 adaptation, which altered Orwell’s ending to provide a "hopeful" second uprising. This revised ending is not an innocent change; it is the evacuation of Orwell’s proof. Orwell’s novella is a closed circuit: the loop—the indistinguishability of pig and human—is the thesis.

Serkis’s framing of the new film as a defense of "fragile virtues" like "integrity" and "democracy" that must be "watched over" encourages a spectator stance. The promise of "some hope" serves as the affective glue that seals the circuit of control. It allows the audience to consume critique as reassurance rather than metabolizing it into understanding. If the film ends with overthrow as resolution, it converts a warning about the structural persistence of rule into a classroom lesson in civics.

Conclusion: The Manufacture of Comfortable Consent

The 2026 Animal Farm can be discredited not as an "unfaithful" copy, but as a machine that closes thought by manufacturing recognition. It installs a world-horizon where the Iconography of Orwell (the slogans, the pigs, the barn) remains, but the mechanism of Orwell (the rations, the record, the dogs) is selected out.

The ultimate gaslight lies in offering freedom as a menu option: vote in the Guild, root for Lucky, and laugh at the "arch-villain" in the Cybertruck. As Deleuze warned, universals like "values" or "hope" explain nothing—they must be explained by the material arrangements they mask. Any adaptation that keeps the animals but loses the non-personal reproduction of domination is a moral cartoon, not a political fable. The slogan changes, but the power remains; the noun changes, but the hunger stays. That is "nicecore’s" political genius: it manufactures consent in the form of comfort.

The Porcine Simulacrum and the Modulated Herd: A Deleuzian Discrediting of the 2026 Animal Farm as an Apparatus of Control (long form)

The forthcoming 2026 animated adaptation of George Orwell’s Animal Farm, directed by Andy Serkis and distributed by Angel Studios, presents itself as a cultural intervention—a retelling of a classic fable ostensibly positioned against "communism and cronyism".1 Scheduled for release on May 1, 2026—International Workers' Day—the film arrives not merely as entertainment, but as a complex semiotic machine embedded within the specific socio-economic infrastructure of the twenty-first century.1 While the surface rhetoric of the production promises a revitalization of Orwell’s warning against totalitarianism, a rigorous analysis through the philosophical lens of Gilles Deleuze reveals the film to be a sophisticated apparatus of "gaslighting"—a mechanism designed to distort the public’s perception of corruption, law enforcement, and oligarchic power.

This report argues that the 2026 Animal Farm functions as a primary artifact of what Deleuze termed the "Society of Control".4 Unlike the 1954 CIA-funded adaptation, which operated under the logic of "Disciplinary Societies" (molding public opinion through covert state propaganda and fixed ideological enclosures), the 2026 iteration operates through "modulation," "dividualization," and the "capitalist axiomatic".6 By replacing Orwell’s "minor literature"—which stutters and deterritorializes the major language of power—with a "major" Hollywood grammar of "coming-of-age" tropes, audience surrogates, and high-gloss animation, the film effectively neutralizes the revolutionary potential of the text.9 Furthermore, the participatory distribution model of the "Angel Guild" serves as a cybernetic feedback loop that manufactures consent under the guise of democratization, effectively gaslighting the audience into participating in their own capture.11

The following analysis dissects the film’s production, narrative alterations, and character designs to demonstrate how Deleuzian concepts—specifically the "powers of the false," the "dogmatic image of thought," and "Oedipalization"—expose the project as a simulation of critique that ultimately reinforces the very oligarchic structures it claims to satirize.

I. From Discipline to Control: The Genealogy of the Animal Farm Adaptation

To understand the specific gaslighting mechanism of the 2026 film, one must first situate it within the historical trajectory of Animal Farm adaptations, mapping the shift from "Disciplinary Power" to "Control Power." Deleuze, in his Postscript on the Societies of Control, identifies a historical transition from environments of enclosure (the prison, the factory, the school) to open systems of modulation (the corporation, the network, the debt).4

The 1954 Adaptation: The Logic of the Mold

The 1954 animated film, secretly funded by the Central Intelligence Agency’s Office of Policy Coordination (OPC), exemplifies the disciplinary logic of the Cold War.6 As detailed in historical analyses of the era, the CIA acquired the rights to Orwell’s novella to use it as a "weaponized allegory".6 The agency’s intervention was structural and distinct: they altered the ending. In Orwell’s text, the pigs and humans become indistinguishable, a bleak realization that power corrupts absolutely, regardless of ideology. The CIA, requiring a clear anti-Soviet directive, imposed a new ending where the animals rise up a second time to overthrow the pigs.6

This alteration functioned as a "mold"—a fixed casting of the narrative intended to produce a specific, uniform ideological product in the minds of the viewer.6 The disciplinary society operates by organizing vast spaces of enclosure; the 1954 film was one such enclosure, a closed pedagogical environment designed to "discipline" the ambiguity of Orwell’s anti-Stalinism into a rigid Cold War binary.6 The message was static: Communism (the pigs) is the problem; removing them restores the natural order (implicitly, liberal capitalism).

The 2026 Adaptation: The Logic of Modulation

The 2026 film, produced by Aniventure and The Imaginarium and distributed by Angel Studios, abandons the rigid mold for the fluid "modulation" of the Control Society.3 Deleuze describes modulation as "a self-deforming cast that will continuously change from one moment to the other," like a sieve whose mesh varies.7 The 2026 film does not rely on covert state funding (the "mold" of the CIA) but on the overt, participatory funding of the "Angel Guild" and the "crowd".11

This shift represents a more insidious form of control. The gaslighting here lies in the illusion of autonomy. The audience is told they are "greenlighting" the film, that they are the arbiters of culture against the "Hollywood gatekeepers".13 However, Deleuze warns that in control societies, "we are taught that corporations have a soul," and the most terrifying instrument is no longer the panopticon but the marketing algorithm.5 The 2026 film’s narrative is not fixed by a government censor but is modulated by market data, "feedback loops," and the imperative of "relatability".12 The film’s stated themes—"anti-communism and anti-cronyism"—are not moral stances but "passwords" that grant access to specific market demographics (conservative, faith-based, anti-establishment), effectively turning the audience’s political anxieties into a data stream that shapes the product.1

Table 1: The Deleuzian Shift in Animal Farm Adaptations

4

II. The Angel Guild as a Cybernetic Apparatus of Capture

Central to the Deleuzian critique of the 2026 film is the infrastructure of its distribution: Angel Studios and the "Angel Guild." Deleuze and Guattari, in A Thousand Plateaus, describe the "apparatus of capture" as a mechanism by which the state or capitalist machine appropriates the "war machine" (creative, nomadic energy) and subordinates it to the laws of work and reproduction.8 The Angel Guild acts as precisely such an apparatus, utilizing the "Torch" system to capture and reterritorialize audience desire.

The "Torch" and the Feedback Loop

The "Torch" process requires filmmakers to submit a "prototype" or short segment (concept video) to the Angel Guild, a body of approximately 1.6 million members who vote on whether the project should proceed.11 This system effectively gamifies cultural production, transforming the work of art into a variable in a cybernetic feedback loop.12

Deleuze argues that control societies function through "continuous assessment" and "universal modulation".7 The "Torch" is not a finished work of art (which might possess the "powers of the false" or the capacity to disturb); it is a probe, designed to test the market's temperature. If the feedback is negative, the project is discarded or modulated until it fits the "Angel" criteria of "amplifying light".11 This eliminates the possibility of the "encounter"—a fundamental Deleuzian concept where art forces us to think by confronting us with something unrecognizable or "intolerable".18

By filtering Animal Farm through this mechanism, Angel Studios ensures that the film cannot be a "minor literature" that challenges the status quo. Instead, it must be "optimized" to please a specific ideological demographic. The gaslighting occurs when this process—strictly a method of risk management and market validation—is sold to the public as "empowerment" or "anti-Hollywood rebellion".13 The audience believes they are choosing the content, but they are merely participating in the algorithm that predicts their own consumption habits. They are not subjects; they are "dividuals," samples, banks, and markets.5

Financializing the Fanbase

The SEC filings for Angel Studios reveal that the "Guild" is not merely a fan club but a tiered structure of financial buy-in and data extraction.11 Members "help fund future films" and "decide what film and TV projects we will market," effectively outsourcing the risk of capital investment to the consumer while retaining the intellectual property rights and profits for the studio executives and primary shareholders.11

Deleuze and Guattari note that the "capitalist axiomatic" is incredibly flexible; it can absorb any flow, including the flow of "anti-establishment" sentiment, and re-code it as a source of surplus value.8 The "Angel Guild" captures the desire for a non-corrupt, non-oligarchic media landscape and re-routes it into a system that replicates the very structures of oligarchic control (centralized profit, distributed risk, data surveillance).11 The film's "anti-cronyism" marketing is thus a "simulacrum" of political action; buying a ticket or voting for a Torch feels like a political act, but it is merely an economic transaction that strengthens the "corporate spirit" Deleuze identified as the soul of the control society.5

III. "Lucky" and the Oedipalization of the Revolution

The most jarring narrative intervention in the 2026 adaptation is the introduction of a new protagonist: "Lucky," a young piglet voiced by Stranger Things star Gaten Matarazzo.3 Described as an "audience surrogate" and a character "torn between competing ideologies" who undergoes a "coming-of-age" journey, Lucky represents the imposition of a "major" narrative form onto Orwell’s collective allegory.3

The Privatization of Desire

In Anti-Oedipus, Deleuze and Guattari critique psychoanalysis and capitalism for "Oedipalizing" the subject—that is, reducing all social and political desire to the private drama of the family (Daddy-Mommy-Me).22 They argue that the "imperialism of Oedipus" colonizes the unconscious, preventing it from investing in the social field directly.22

Orwell’s Animal Farm is a story about a collective assemblage—the animals as a class—and the degeneration of that collective into hierarchy. It is a "molecular" struggle. By centering the 2026 film on Lucky, a single individual navigating these systems, the filmmakers "molarize" the narrative.28 The revolution is no longer a question of class struggle, material conditions, or the structural nature of power; it becomes a backdrop for Lucky’s personal growth and moral maturation.10

This "coming-of-age" framework (or Bildungsroman) is the quintessential "major" literary form of Western individualism, designed to integrate the youth into the social order.31 Deleuze contends that capitalism requires subjects who believe their problems are personal rather than political. By framing the tragedy of Animal Farm through Lucky’s eyes—a "naive" character who "gets corrupted" but then "realizes the truth"—the film gaslights the audience into believing that systemic corruption is a matter of individual moral failure or "bad choices," rather than an inherent feature of the "capitalist axiomatic".30

The Audience Surrogate as a Blockage to Thought

Deleuze disparages the concept of the "hero" or "audience surrogate" in favor of the "seer".19 In modern political cinema (the "time-image"), characters often lose their agency; they become helpless witnesses to the "intolerable" nature of the world, which forces the audience to think.19 Orwell’s original text forces the reader into this position of the "seer" at the end, witnessing the indistinguishability of pig and human.

Lucky, however, is an "action-image" protagonist.34 He "saves Animal Farm" and "finds the courage to stand up," implying a restoration of agency that Deleuze would argue is fraudulent in a society of control.30 The existence of Lucky reassures the audience: "You are not helpless; you are just like Lucky. If you make the right choices, you can fix the farm." This is the "dogmatic image of thought"—a form of recognition that comforts the thinker rather than challenging them.18 It prevents the "encounter" with the reality of oligarchic power, substituting it with a "family-friendly" fable of personal redemption.15

IV. The Simulacrum of the Oligarch: Freida Pilkington and the Cybertruck

The 2026 film introduces a new antagonist: Freida Pilkington, voiced by Glenn Close.3 Described as a "billionaire industrial agriculture magnate" and a "scheming neighbor," Pilkington drives a vehicle explicitly modeled on the Tesla Cybertruck and uses "high-tech drones" to spy on the animals.10

The "Anti-Cronyism" Diversion

Angel Studios has repeatedly clarified that the film is "anti-communism and anti-cronyism".1 This linguistic distinction is crucial. In Deleuzian analysis, concepts are tools. The concept of "cronyism" is a tool used to save the concept of "capitalism." By attacking "cronyism," one implies that there is a "pure" or "honest" capitalism that has been corrupted by bad actors.41

Freida Pilkington is the embodiment of this "crony" figure—a specific, villainous caricature of a tech-oligarch (Elon Musk).38 Deleuze would identify this as a "simulacrum"—not in the sense of a "fake," but in the sense of a representation that has detached from reality to serve a specific function.42 By focusing the audience’s ire on the aesthetic of the modern oligarch (the Cybertruck, the drones, the "scheming"), the film performs an inoculation.44 It allows the audience to vent their frustration at the image of the oligarch while leaving the structure that produces oligarchs (the capitalist axiomatic) untouched.

Reterritorializing the Critique

Deleuze and Guattari argue that capitalism operates through a process of deterritorialization (breaking things down) and reterritorialization (building them back up in a profitable form).8 The film takes the "deterritorialized" anxiety of the American public regarding wealth inequality and tech-oligarchs and "reterritorializes" it onto the cartoonish figure of Freida Pilkington.

If the problem is Freida (and by extension, specific "bad" billionaires), then the solution is simply to replace her with "good" owners or "honest" business practices. This gaslights the public by obscuring the Deleuzian insight that the "axiom" of capitalism is inequality.8 There is no "good" capitalism corrupted by cronies; the "monstrous" accumulation of capital is the system functioning exactly as designed. By presenting a "Cybertruck villain," the film engages in "reputational hygiene" for the system itself, suggesting that the excess is the problem, not the essence.6

Table 2: The Semiotics of the New Villain

1

V. Law Enforcement and the Dogs: The Normalization of Dataveillance

In Orwell’s novella, the dogs are the instrument of terror—the secret police.6 In the 2026 film, the representation of enforcement shifts to match the "Society of Control." The trailer depicts Napoleon and Squealer (Kieran Culkin) using Pilkington’s drones to monitor the farm.10

From Panopticon to Dataveillance

Deleuze famously noted that "we are in a generalized crisis in relation to all the environments of enclosure".7 The Panopticon (the few watching the many from a central tower) has been replaced by "dataveillance" (the many watching the many, and the system watching everyone).20

The film’s depiction of drones and surveillance technology as "goofy" or part of a "bright, shiny" adventure trivializes the "suffocating reality" of the control society.47 This is a form of gaslighting that renders the instruments of oppression "relatable" and "fun." By integrating these technologies into a "family-friendly" narrative, the film engages in what Deleuze might call a "training" of the senses.6 It acclimates the "younger generation" (the target audience) to the omnipresence of surveillance, presenting it not as a violation of the self, but as a tool of narrative progression—a "theatrical prop" in the drama of the farm.49

Furthermore, the "dogs" in this adaptation are likely to be "militarized" in design but "comedic" in execution, following the "Hollywood formula" of sanitizing violence.6 This disconnect between the reality of militarized police in the US (the "dogs" of the state) and their animated counterparts serves to sever the link between the sign and the referent, making it harder for the audience to "map" the critique onto their own reality.19

VI. Major Language vs. Minor Literature: The Cliché of the Blockbuster

Deleuze and Guattari developed the concept of "Minor Literature" in their study of Kafka. A minor literature is not the literature of a minor language, but "that which a minority constructs within a major language".9 It is characterized by the deterritorialization of language, the connection of the individual to the immediate political, and the collective assemblage of enunciation.9 Orwell’s Animal Farm, written in a "plain," "fable-like" English, functioned as a minor literature—it stuttered the major language of political discourse to reveal the absurdity of power.9

The Imposition of the "Major"

The 2026 film is the antithesis of minor literature. It is constructed entirely within the "major language" of the Hollywood blockbuster (despite being produced by Angel Studios, it adheres to the "Hollywood formula").6

• The Cast: The use of A-list celebrities (Seth Rogen, Woody Harrelson, Glenn Close) imposes a "standard" of recognition.3 Seth Rogen’s voice is a "cliché"—a sensory-motor linkage that triggers immediate, habitual recognition (the "stoner laugh," the "lovable goof").54 This prevents the audience from hearing the "pig" and instead makes them hear "Seth Rogen," destroying the becoming-animal of the fable.56

• The Animation: The "bright, shiny," high-quality CGI (produced by Cinesite) creates a "smooth space" of visual consumption that lacks the "haptic" or "intensive" quality of minor cinema.9 It is "over-coded" with cuteness and commercial appeal.

The Logic of the Cliché

In Cinema 2, Deleuze argues that we live in a civilization of the cliché.58 A cliché is an image where we perceive only what we are interested in—a sensory-motor image that triggers a habitual response (see lion -> run; see cute pig -> say "aww").58 The 2026 film is an assemblage of clichés: the "scheming neighbor," the "naive hero," the "redemptive uprising".60

Deleuze argues that the task of art is to "break through the cliché" to find the "intolerable" reality beneath.59 The gaslighting of this film lies in its saturation of clichés. It fills the screen with so much recognizable, "relatable" content (pop songs like Portugal. The Man’s "Feel It Still," Cybertruck jokes) that it prevents any genuine "thought" or "encounter".48 It numbs the critical faculties by overwhelming the viewer with the "familiar," effectively hiding the "intolerable" reality of the oligarchic control it claims to depict.

Conclusion: The Ultimate Gaslight – Freedom as a Menu Option

The 2026 Animal Farm is not merely a "bad adaptation"; it is a philosophical weapon of the Society of Control. Through the lens of Gilles Deleuze, we can see that the film operates as a machine that:

1. Captures Dissent: Using the "Angel Guild" to channel anti-establishment energy into a profitable feedback loop.11

2. Privatizes the Political: Using "Lucky" and the "coming-of-age" narrative to Oedipalize the class struggle, blaming individual corruption rather than systemic axioms.30

3. Simulates Critique: Using Freida Pilkington to create a "safe" target (the crony) that protects the broader Capitalist Axiomatic from scrutiny.38

4. Enforces the Cliché: Using "major" aesthetics and celebrity voices to prevent the formation of a "minor" consciousness that could actually threaten power.9

The film gaslights the American public by offering them a "choice" (vote in the Guild, root for Lucky, laugh at the Cybertruck) within a system that has already predetermined the outcome. It tells the audience that they are free, that the revolution is possible, and that the "pigs" can be overthrown, all while reinforcing the very mechanisms—surveillance, modulation, corporate consolidation—that keep the "barn" locked tight. As Deleuze warned, "There is no need to fear or hope, but only to look for new weapons." The 2026 Animal Farm is not a weapon for the people; it is a weapon against them, disguised as a toy.

The "brighter future" promised by the film’s revised ending is the final simulacrum: a hope that paralyzes action, a belief in this world’s potential for reform that obscures the necessity of creating a new people and a new earth.10 In the end, the film does not expose the oligarchs; it invites the audience to become them, one "Torch" vote at a time.

Works cited

1. New Animal Farm animated comedy is getting roasted already - Creative Bloq, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.creativebloq.com/art/animation/new-animal-farm-animated-comedy-is-getting-roasted-already

2. Angel Gets Backlash For ANIMAL FARM Trailer: Is it Warranted? - YouTube, accessed February 4, 2026, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=40_5J4Rn7Os

3. ANGEL to Release ANIMAL FARM, Coming to Theaters May 1, 2026, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.angel.com/press/release/angel-to-release-animal-farm-coming-to-theaters-may-1-2026

4. Complex Control and the Governmentality of Digital Platforms - Frontiers, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-cities/articles/10.3389/frsc.2020.00006/pdf

5. Download File, accessed February 4, 2026, https://biggsrbr.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/4/4/8744974/deleuze_-_societies_of_control.docx

6. essays, 6.pdf

7. Instant scholar: Societies of control - Understanding Gilles Deleuze's vision of contemporary power - The Times of India, accessed February 4, 2026, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/instant-scholar-societies-of-control-understanding-gilles-deleuzes-vision-of-contemporary-power/articleshow/121893596.cms

8. (PDF) Deleuze and the deterritorialization of strategy - ResearchGate, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316592808_Deleuze_and_the_deterritorialization_of_strategy

9. Rhizomatic Cinema: Film Poetry as Minor Literature, accessed February 4, 2026, https://filmpoetry.org/archives/896303

10. 'Animal Farm' review: Director Andy Serkis softens George Orwell classic for family animation - Screen Daily, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.screendaily.com/reviews/animal-farm-review-director-andy-serkis-softens-george-orwell-classic-for-family-animation/5205814.article

11. Angel Studios (NYSE: ANGX) files S-3 amendment for 10042523-share resale - Stock Titan, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.stocktitan.net/sec-filings/ANGX/s-3-a-angel-studios-inc-amended-shelf-registration-statement-ece5b0848dc1.html

12. Control Societies and Platform Logic. New Formations - City Research Online, accessed February 5, 2026, https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16763/1/Control%20Societies%20and%20Platform%20Logic%20Essay.pdf

13. Angel Studios and the Transformation of Audience-Driven Media Finance_ a Comprehensive Analysis of I | PDF - Scribd, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/959466440/Angel-Studios-and-the-Transformation-of-Audience-Driven-Media-Finance-a-Comprehensive-Analysis-of-I

14. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations and Organization Formation on Web3 (Chapter 9), accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/web3/decentralized-autonomous-organizations-and-organization-formation-on-web3/2CE8ED9FA3B372DE451F1DA77176E0DF

15. Can you feel my heart beat so? I can't let it go: lyric, repetition, and the poematic subject in question - Digital Commons @ Wayne State, accessed February 5, 2026, https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=woodwardreview

16. Shape The Future of Entertainment With Your Film Or Show - Angel, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.angel.com/submit

17. What is a Torch? - Angel, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.angel.com/blog/angel-studios/posts/what-is-a-torch

18. Gilles Deleuze - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 4, 2026, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/deleuze/

19. Contemporary Screen Ethics: Absences, Identities, Belonging, Looking Anew 9781474447584, 9781474447591, 9781474447607 - DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed February 5, 2026, https://dokumen.pub/contemporary-screen-ethics-absences-identities-belonging-looking-anew-9781474447584-9781474447591-9781474447607.html

20. Playing Politics: Social Media, Censorship, and Speech Gamification - Emory Law Scholarly Commons, accessed February 4, 2026, https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1571&context=elj

21. ANGEL STUDIOS, INC._December 31, 2024 - SEC.gov, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1671941/000155837025004007/none-20241231x10k.htm

22. CAPITALISM AND SCHIZOPHRENIA - Libcom.org, accessed February 5, 2026, https://files.libcom.org/files/Anti-Oedipus.pdf

23. Angel Studios, Inc. - SEC.gov, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1865200/000110465925090129/angx-20250630xs1.htm

24. deleuze and contemporary dystopia a thesis submitted to the graduate school of social sciences of - Middle East Technical University, accessed February 4, 2026, https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12622350/index.pdf

25. Meet the Star-Studded Cast of the Upcoming 'Animal Farm' Film - Oreate AI Blog, accessed February 5, 2026, http://oreateai.com/blog/meet-the-starstudded-cast-of-the-upcoming-animal-farm-film/b7f02a464823b87e0ccf6f2d613b31ef

26. accessed February 4, 2026, https://animalfarm.fandom.com/wiki/Lucky#:~:text=Lucky%20is%20an%20original%20character,Stranger%20Things%20and%20The%20Blacklist.

27. Radical Freud (Part III) - Cold War Freud - Cambridge University Press, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cold-war-freud/radical-freud/63F302EA572BDB44407CCA75F7C0B7EE

28. LAYERING IMAGES, THWARTING FABLES: DELEUZE, RANCIÈRE AND THE ALLEGORIES OF CINEMA Agustín Zarzosa (Purchase College, SUNY) In, accessed February 4, 2026, https://cinema.fcsh.unl.pt/index.php/revista/article/download/160/160/161

29. Carrying the Earth to the Sky: Claire Denis's Perverse Ecologies - Project MUSE, accessed February 4, 2026, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/886518

30. Lucky | Animal Farm Wiki | Fandom, accessed February 5, 2026, https://animalfarm.fandom.com/wiki/Lucky

31. CHALLENGING THE COMING-OF-AGE: SIMILITUDES AND DIVERGENCES OF CONTEMPORARY FEMALE BILDUNGSROMAN WITH TRADITIONAL INSTANCES - ADDI, accessed February 5, 2026, https://addi.ehu.es/bitstream/handle/10810/23580/TFG_Matas.pdf?sequence=2

32. Novels of ripening: The maturation of the bildungsroman - University of Galway Research Repository, accessed February 5, 2026, https://researchrepository.universityofgalway.ie/bitstreams/541986b2-6709-41bc-a610-6df210ca7d23/download

33. Machinic desire - xenopraxis, accessed February 4, 2026, http://xenopraxis.net/readings/land_machinicdesire.pdf

34. The Intensive-Image in Deleuze's Film-Philosophy 9781399517553 - DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed February 4, 2026, https://dokumen.pub/the-intensive-image-in-deleuzes-film-philosophy-9781399517553.html

35. Thought and Image (Deleuze Cinema) | jewish philosophy place, accessed February 4, 2026, https://jewishphilosophyplace.com/2018/07/11/thought-and-image-deleuze-cinema/

36. A Multidimensional Exploration Based on Hofstede's Cultural Theory: An Empirical Study on Chinese Audience Acceptance of American Animated Films - NIH, accessed February 4, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11851816/

37. Trailer For Andy Serkis-Directed Animated Adaptation of ANIMAL FARM is Not What I Expected - GeekTyrant, accessed February 5, 2026, https://geektyrant.com/news/trailer-for-andy-serkis-directed-animated-adaptation-of-animal-farm

38. Andy Serkis' 'Animal Farm' Reimagined as 'Woke' Take on Capitalism, Sparks Outrage With Fans - Comic Basics, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.comicbasics.com/andy-serkis-animal-farm-reimagined-as-woke-take-on-capitalism-sparks-outrage-with-fans/

39. accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.screendaily.com/reviews/animal-farm-review-director-andy-serkis-softens-george-orwell-classic-for-family-animation/5205814.article#:~:text=Elsewhere%2C%20the%20farm's%20human%20neighbour,farm%20using%20high%2Dtech%20drones.

40. Angel Studios Faces Backlash Over Andy Serkis' 'Animal Farm' Cast, Which Includes Trans and Gay Voice Actors - ChurchLeaders, accessed February 5, 2026, https://churchleaders.com/news/2210536-angel-studios-backlash-animal-farm-andy-serkis-gay-trans.html/2

41. (PDF) Accumulation and Scarcity: An Accountability Safari - ResearchGate, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30387983_Accumulation_and_Scarcity_An_Accountability_Safari

42. Simulacrum | The Global Sixties - The Middlebury Sites Network, accessed February 4, 2026, https://sites.middlebury.edu/global60s/keywordsclarifications/simulacrum/

43. SIMULACRUM-CHhypertext - CHRISTIAN HUBERT STUDIO, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.christianhubert.com/writing/simulacrum

44. Deleuze's Philosophical Lineage - Eli Meyerhoff, accessed February 4, 2026, http://www.elimeyerhoff.com/books/Deleuze/Graham%20Jones,%20Deleuze%27s%20Philosophical%20Lineage.pdf

45. Deleuze and the Deterritorialization of Strategy - Diva-portal.org, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1470126/FULLTEXT01.pdf

46. The New State of Surveillance: Societies of Subjugation, accessed February 4, 2026, https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4772&context=wlulr

47. (PDF) Deleuze's Postscript on the Societies of Control: Updated for Big Data and Predictive Analytics - ResearchGate, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344029870_Deleuze's_Postscript_on_the_Societies_of_Control_Updated_for_Big_Data_and_Predictive_Analytics

48. 'Animal Farm' Trailer: Andy Serkis' Long-Awaited Animation Turns George Orwell's Cautions Into Bright & Shiny Kiddie Stuff - The Playlist, accessed February 5, 2026, https://theplaylist.net/animal-farm-trailer-andy-serkis-long-awaited-animation-turns-george-orwells-cautions-into-bright-shiny-kiddie-stuff-20251212/

49. Dionysiac Machines: videogames and the triumph of the simulacra Seth Giddings, University of the West of England, UK draft vers, accessed February 4, 2026, https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/434416/1/Dionysiac_Machines_draft.pdf

50. ANIMAL FARM | Official Trailer (2026) 4K - YouTube, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtjPGXZLW6g

51. The People Are Missing - dokumen.pub, accessed February 4, 2026, https://dokumen.pub/download/the-people-are-missing-minor-literature-today-provocations-1496224310-9781496224316.html

52. The minor Cronenberg: New Review of Film and Television Studies - Taylor & Francis, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17400309.2017.1303231

53. (PDF) In Deleuze and Guattari: What is the Minor Writing? from the Perspective of Difference and the Minor Literature - ResearchGate, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359009781_In_Deleuze_and_Guattari_What_is_the_Minor_Writing_from_the_Perspective_of_Difference_and_the_Minor_Literature

54. DELEUZE AND FILM'S PHILOSOPHICAL VALUE DELEUZE AND FILM'S PHILOSOPHICAL VALUE - SciELO, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.scielo.br/j/kr/a/HNqvLMPKbrhYpmJYsg7sCXt/

55. DELEUZE, GRODAL, AND THE METAPHYSICS OF COGNITIVE FILM THEORY Raghu Menon Jayakumar A thesis submitted for the degree of Master - STORRE, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.storre.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/27348/3/MPhil%20thesis.pdf

56. The Aesthetics, Politics and Ethics of Becoming-Animal in Thomas Hardy's Novels, accessed February 4, 2026, https://journals.openedition.org/fathom/2177

57. Becoming-Animal-is-a-Trap-for-Humans-Deleuze-and-Guattari-in-Madagascar.pdf - ResearchGate, accessed February 4, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Timothy-Laurie/publication/279059799_Becoming-Animal_is_a_Trap_for_Humans_Deleuze_and_Guattari_in_Madagascar/links/55894dbc08ae273b2875c8b7/Becoming-Animal-is-a-Trap-for-Humans-Deleuze-and-Guattari-in-Madagascar.pdf

58. The Time-Image - Gilles Deleuze - University of Warwick, accessed February 4, 2026, https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/english/currentstudents/undergraduates/modules/literaturetheoryandtime/ltt_--_deleuze_cinema_2_1.pdf

59. Gilles Deleuze - Eli Meyerhoff, accessed February 4, 2026, http://www.elimeyerhoff.com/books/Deleuze/Gilles%20Deleuze%20-%20Cinema%202_The%20Time_Image.pdf

60. Animal Farm (2026) (Western Animation) - TV Tropes, accessed February 5, 2026, https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/WesternAnimation/AnimalFarm2026

61. Control and Cinema: Intolerable Poverty and the Films of Béla Tarr | Deleuze Studies, accessed February 5, 2026, https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/dls.2017.0252

62. Trailer for Andy Serkis' Animated ANIMAL FARM Is So Wrong - Nerdist, accessed February 5, 2026, https://nerdist.com/article/animal-farm-trailer-andy-serkis-seth-rogen-george-orwell/

63. Machinic Desire - OnScenes, accessed February 4, 2026, https://onscenes.weebly.com/philophiction/machinic-desire